🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's parliament members have voted to withdraw from an global treaty designed to protect women from violence, including family violence, following prolonged and heated discussions in the parliament.

Several thousand of protesters gathered in Riga this week to voice disagreement with the vote. The final authority now lies with President the nation's president, who must determine whether to approve or reject the proposed law.

Known as the European treaty, the international accord only took effect in Latvia last year, mandating authorities to develop laws and assistance programs to end all types of violence.

Latvia has become the first EU country to initiate the procedure of exiting from the treaty. Turkey withdrew in 2021, a move that human rights organizations characterized as a significant regression for gender equality.

Political Controversy and Resistance

The international agreement was ratified by the European Union in last year, yet traditionalist groups have contended that its focus on gender equality undermines family values and promotes what they term "gender ideology".

Following a lengthy discussion in the Latvian parliament, lawmakers voted 56 to 32 to withdraw from the treaty, a action sponsored by political opponents but supported by politicians from one of the three governing partners.

The outcome represents a defeat for centre-right government leader the nation's PM, who stood with protesters outside parliament earlier this seven-day period. "We will not surrender, we will persist in our struggle so that violence does not triumph," she declared to the crowd.

Ideological Divisions and Reactions

One of the primary parties supporting the withdrawal is Latvia First, whose head has urged the public to choose between what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "non-binary concepts with multiple sexes".

Latvia's ombudswoman Karina Palkova appealed for the treaty not to be made political, while the group Equality Now asserted it was "not a danger to national principles, it served as a tool to realize them".

The Thursday's vote has sparked widespread protest both inside Latvia and abroad.

Twenty-two thousand individuals have signed a Latvian petition calling for the treaty to be maintained. The women's rights organization Centrs Marta has called a demonstration for the coming week, accusing MPs of disregarding the will of the Latvian people.

Global Worries and Possible Future Actions

The leader of the European organization's parliamentary assembly commented that Latvia had made a hasty decision fueled by misinformation. He described it as an "never-before-seen and deeply concerning step backward for female equality and human rights in the continent".

He noted that since the transcontinental nation abandoned the convention in 2021, instances of femicide and abuse targeting females had increased significantly.

Because the decision did not achieve a two-thirds majority, the president could possibly send back the bill for further consideration if he has objections.

President the national leader announced on digital platforms that he would evaluate the vote according to legal principles, "taking into account governmental and judicial considerations, instead of ideological or political perspectives".

Last week, another component of the ruling coalition, the Progressives, indicated it would not rule out petitioning to the Constitutional Court.

"This vote represents a worrisome situation for gender equality not only in our nation but throughout the continent," commented a human rights advocate.

• Family violence rates have been increasing in several European nations
• The Istanbul Convention requires specific safeguards for victims of gender-based violence
• The nation's decision could affect similar debates in other member states